Close Menu
    What's Hot

    What to Expect Next for Bitcoin? Which Direction is the Path Towards?

    Monday, 7 April 2025, 19:08

    BlackRock CEO Fink Warns of Further Market Drop, Recession, and Inflationary Pressures

    Monday, 7 April 2025, 16:50

    Trump Threatens 50% Additional Tariffs on China

    Monday, 7 April 2025, 16:08
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    CryptoMars
    CryptoMars
    • Home
    • News
    • Bitcoin
    • Ethereum
    • Solana
    • Cardano
    • XRP
    X (Twitter) Telegram
    CryptoMars
    Home » Uncertainty Looms Over New SEC Chairmanship: What’s Next for Crypto?
    News

    Uncertainty Looms Over New SEC Chairmanship: What’s Next for Crypto?

    Max BauerBy Max BauerTuesday, 5 November 2024, 16:24No Comments3 Mins Read

    As speculation mounts regarding Gary Gensler’s tenure as chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the cryptocurrency industry is closely watching the political landscape for signs of potential change. Gensler, in his three years at the helm, has become a polarizing figure in the crypto world, with many firms alleging that he has waged an unfair campaign against them. In response, the industry has poured significant resources into the 2024 election, aiming to secure Gensler’s ousting.

    Both major political candidates have signaled intentions that could affect Gensler’s future. Donald Trump, the Republican frontrunner, has vowed to remove Gensler if elected, stating he would do so on his first day in office. Meanwhile, Vice President Kamala Harris has recently shifted from President Biden’s stringent anti-crypto stance, expressing support for establishing a regulatory framework for digital assets.

    Potential Successors: Who Might Take the Helm?

    Should Gensler be replaced, speculation is rife about who might step into the role. Trump is reportedly considering former SEC Commissioner Dan Gallagher and current Commissioner Hester Peirce. Harris, on the other hand, may look at Chris Brummer or Erica Williams as potential candidates.

    Dan Gallagher has a history with the SEC, having served as a commissioner during the Obama administration. Currently, he is the Chief Legal Officer at Robinhood, a trading platform engaged in both stocks and cryptocurrencies. Gallagher has criticized the SEC’s current approach, arguing that it relies too heavily on enforcement rather than providing clear regulatory frameworks.

    Hester Peirce, appointed during the Trump administration, has been vocal about her discontent with the SEC’s aggressive tactics towards the crypto industry. She has called for a more constructive approach to regulation, emphasizing the need for clarity and guidance rather than punitive measures.

    READ  New Bitcoin Whales Drive Market Surge as Share Hits 60%, Says CryptoQuant

    In a Harris Administration

    If Harris wins the presidency, the SEC could see a different direction under her leadership. She has acknowledged the significance of crypto-friendly voters and has proposed measures to bolster the U.S. position in blockchain technology. However, Harris has also tread carefully, wary of alienating constituents who are skeptical of cryptocurrencies.

    Chris Brummer, a prominent figure in financial regulation and the founder of DC Fintech Week, is among those being considered for the SEC chair position under a Harris administration. His recent venture, a crypto disclosure company named Bluprynt, aims to facilitate regulatory compliance for crypto firms globally.

    Erica Williams, who currently chairs the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), is another potential candidate. While she has not publicly commented extensively on crypto, her role involves overseeing audits related to public companies, and her board has begun focusing on emerging risks associated with cryptocurrencies.

    Regardless of who ultimately takes over the SEC, industry experts emphasize the necessity of a regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies. Jenice Malecki, chair of the New York State Bar Association’s Securities Arbitration Committee, argues that a lack of regulation is detrimental to all stakeholders involved, from investors to legitimate crypto businesses.

    “Non-regulation hurts everyone. It allows bad actors to run rampant,” Malecki stated. “While I don’t know exactly what regulation should look like, it is clear that it is needed.”

    Related

    Max Bauer
    • Website

    Add A Comment

    Comments are closed.

    Advertisement
    Our Most Popular Articles
    • Telegram Announces Removal of "People Nearby" Feature and New Updates
      Telegram Announces Removal of "People Nearby" Feature and New Updates
    • Telegram Founder: “IP Addresses And Phone Numbers Of Users Who Violate The Rules May Be Disclosed To Relevant Agencies Upon Legal Request”
      Telegram Founder: “IP Addresses And Phone Numbers Of Users Who Violate The Rules May Be Disclosed To Relevant Agencies Upon Legal Request”
    • HEX Founder Richard Heart Added to Interpol's Most Wanted List
      HEX Founder Richard Heart Added to Interpol's Most Wanted List
    • Home
    • Disclaimer
    • Privacy Policy
    • Contact Us
    © 2025 CryptoMars

    Disclaimer: The information on this site is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Investing in cryptocurrencies involves risk, including loss of principal. Always conduct your own research and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. We are not liable for any losses or damages incurred as a result of using the information provided on this site.

    For inquiries related to news tips, advertising, partnerships, or media requests, please contact info@cryptomars.net

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.